Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Mills, 03-41654 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-41654 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41654 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL BRADLEY MILLS, also known as Brad Mills, also known as Squeeky, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-75-3 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CU
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                             FILED
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS        June 23, 2004
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                       Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                               Clerk

                            No. 03-41654
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

MICHAEL BRADLEY MILLS,
also known as Brad Mills,
also known as Squeeky,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 4:02-CR-75-3
                        --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael

Bradley Mills has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Mills has not filed a response.

     Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issues in this direct appeal.   Accordingly, the

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein.   The appeal is DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer