Filed: Jun. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41654 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL BRADLEY MILLS, also known as Brad Mills, also known as Squeeky, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-75-3 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CU
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41654 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL BRADLEY MILLS, also known as Brad Mills, also known as Squeeky, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-75-3 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CUR..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-41654
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL BRADLEY MILLS,
also known as Brad Mills,
also known as Squeeky,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:02-CR-75-3
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael
Bradley Mills has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Mills has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issues in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein. The appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.