Filed: Jun. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41691 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAIME REYNA-SALINAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-CR-201-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, counsel for J
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41691 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAIME REYNA-SALINAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-CR-201-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, counsel for Ja..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-41691
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAIME REYNA-SALINAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-00-CR-201-1
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, counsel for Jaime Reyna-
Salinas, has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). A copy of counsel’s motion and brief has been sent to
Reyna-Salinas, but he has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.