Filed: Aug. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51085 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESUS OSCAR RODRIGUEZ-OLIVAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-02-CR-6-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51085 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESUS OSCAR RODRIGUEZ-OLIVAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-02-CR-6-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-51085
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JESUS OSCAR RODRIGUEZ-OLIVAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. MO-02-CR-6-ALL
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Jesus Oscar Rodriguez-Olivas has
moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Rodriguez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but
has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief
and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.