Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Rodriguez-Olivas, 03-51085 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-51085 Visitors: 112
Filed: Aug. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51085 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESUS OSCAR RODRIGUEZ-OLIVAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-02-CR-6-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for
More
                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                               FILED
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS       August 18, 2004
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk

                              No. 03-51085
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                       Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

JESUS OSCAR RODRIGUEZ-OLIVAS,
                                       Defendant-Appellant.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Western District of Texas
                       USDC No. MO-02-CR-6-ALL
                          --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Jesus Oscar Rodriguez-Olivas has

moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Rodriguez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but

has not filed a response.     Our independent review of the brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.     Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer