Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Rodriguez-Muniz, 04-40004 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-40004 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40004 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MAURICIO RODRIGUEZ-MUNIZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-03-CR-1130-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mauricio Rodriguez-Muniz ple
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                             FILED
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS      August 18, 2004
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                       Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                               Clerk

                            No. 04-40004
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAURICIO RODRIGUEZ-MUNIZ,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                    USDC No. L-03-CR-1130-ALL
                       --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Mauricio Rodriguez-Muniz pleaded guilty to one charge of

illegal reentry into the United States.   The district court

sentenced him to 46 months in prison and a three-year term of

supervised release.   Rodriguez-Muniz argues in this appeal that

the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).   This argument is, as Rodriguez-

Muniz concedes, foreclosed.   See Almendarez-Torres v. United


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 04-40004
                                 -2-

States, 
523 U.S. 224
(1998); United States v. Dabeit, 
231 F.3d 979
, 984 (5th Cir. 2000).   The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer