Filed: Oct. 13, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 13, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40026 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, versus MICHAEL LYNN MOSES, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 2:02-CR-13-2 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES AND STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Michael Lynn
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 13, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40026 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, versus MICHAEL LYNN MOSES, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 2:02-CR-13-2 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES AND STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Michael Lynn ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
October 13, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-40026
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-
Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL LYNN MOSES,
Defendant-
Appellant.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:02-CR-13-2
----------------------------------------------------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES AND STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Michael Lynn Moses has filed a motion to withdraw and an
accompanying brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). An independent
review of counsel’s brief, Moses’s response, and the record reflects that there are no nonfrivolous
issues for appeal. Accordingly, Moses’s motion for the appointment of substitute appellate counsel
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-40026
-2-
is DENIED; counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.