Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. William George Dunbar, M. D., 78-1602 (1979)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 78-1602 Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 01, 1979
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 600 F.2d 1192 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William George DUNBAR, M. D., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 78-1602, 78-5050. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Aug. 1, 1979. Randall M. Clark, Brunswick, Ga., for defendant-appellant. Wm. T. Moore, Jr., U. S. Atty., Katherine L. Henry, William H. McAbee, II, Asst. U. S. Attys., Savannah, Ga., Wade Livingston, William C. Bryson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee. (Opinion March 26, 1979, 5 Cir., 591 F.2d 1190 ) Befor
More

600 F.2d 1192

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William George DUNBAR, M. D., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 78-1602, 78-5050.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 1, 1979.

Randall M. Clark, Brunswick, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

Wm. T. Moore, Jr., U. S. Atty., Katherine L. Henry, William H. McAbee, II, Asst. U. S. Attys., Savannah, Ga., Wade Livingston, William C. Bryson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee.

(Opinion March 26, 1979, 5 Cir., 591 F.2d 1190)

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer