Filed: Nov. 03, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 3, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-10371 Summary Calendar LINDA KALMBACH; ET AL, Plaintiffs, LINDA KALMBACH AND DOUGLAS O. CREWSE, PlaintiffS-AppellantS, versus AT&T BROADBAND, LLC n/k/a COMCAST PHONE OF TEXAS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:02-CV-930-BD-R - Before DAVIS, SMITH, and
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 3, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-10371 Summary Calendar LINDA KALMBACH; ET AL, Plaintiffs, LINDA KALMBACH AND DOUGLAS O. CREWSE, PlaintiffS-AppellantS, versus AT&T BROADBAND, LLC n/k/a COMCAST PHONE OF TEXAS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:02-CV-930-BD-R - Before DAVIS, SMITH, and D..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 3, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-10371
Summary Calendar
LINDA KALMBACH; ET AL,
Plaintiffs,
LINDA KALMBACH AND DOUGLAS O. CREWSE,
PlaintiffS-AppellantS,
versus
AT&T BROADBAND, LLC n/k/a COMCAST PHONE OF TEXAS, LLC,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
No. 3:02-CV-930-BD-R
--------------------
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-Appellants Linda Kalmbach and Douglas Crewse appeal
the district court’s grant of Defendant-Appellee AT&T Broadband’s
motion for judgment as a matter of law under Fed. R. Civ. P.
50(a)(1) on the issue of mental anguish damages for their claims of
fraud and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practice Act.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-60035
-2-
TEX. BUS. & COMM. CODE §17.50(b)(1). The judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.