Avant v. Lowes Home Ctr Inc, 04-60214 (2004)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 04-60214
Visitors: 50
Filed: Oct. 25, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 25, 2004 FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-60214 (Summary Calendar) _ DARLENE AVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOWE’S HOME CENTERS INC; ET AL Defendants LOWE’S HOME CENTERS INC; BRYAN WEINGARDNER, Individually and as an employee of Lowe’s; JEFF MARKELL, Individually and as an employee of Lowe’s Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District o
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 25, 2004 FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-60214 (Summary Calendar) _ DARLENE AVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOWE’S HOME CENTERS INC; ET AL Defendants LOWE’S HOME CENTERS INC; BRYAN WEINGARDNER, Individually and as an employee of Lowe’s; JEFF MARKELL, Individually and as an employee of Lowe’s Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 25, 2004 FIFTH CIRCUIT _________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-60214 (Summary Calendar) _________________ DARLENE AVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOWE’S HOME CENTERS INC; ET AL Defendants LOWE’S HOME CENTERS INC; BRYAN WEINGARDNER, Individually and as an employee of Lowe’s; JEFF MARKELL, Individually and as an employee of Lowe’s Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:02-CV-88-M-D Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Marlene Avant appeals the district court’s order granting Lowe’s Home Centers’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm the district court’s judgment essentially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion of February 7, 2004. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. AFFIRMED. -2-
Source: CourtListener
