Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Moye, 04-50670 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-50670 Visitors: 33
Filed: Dec. 17, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50670 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK MOYE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-30-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Cr
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 17, 2004

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 04-50670
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK MOYE,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. 1:04-CR-30-ALL
                       --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Patrick Moye

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro,

377 F.3d 464
, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed

(U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held that Blakely v.

Washington, 
124 S. Ct. 2531
(2004), does not apply to the United

States Sentencing Guidelines.   The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer