Filed: Jan. 07, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 6, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-10398 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL D. LUJAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-47-10 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Manuel D. Lujan appeals the district co
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 6, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-10398 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL D. LUJAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-47-10 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Manuel D. Lujan appeals the district cou..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 6, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-10398
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL D. LUJAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:03-CR-47-10
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Manuel D. Lujan appeals the district court’s denial of his
motion for an extension of time to file a late appeal from his
conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Lujan’s
motion for leave to file an untimely notice of appeal was not
filed within the 40-day period prescribed by FED. R. APP. P.
4(b)(4). Therefore, the district court was without authority to
extend the appeal period, and Lujan had no right to relief by
showing excusable neglect or good cause. See United States v.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-10398
-2-
Awalt,
728 F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir. 1984); FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(4).
Accordingly, Lujan’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction; his motions for the appointment of counsel and a
copy of the transcript at government expense are DENIED.