Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Mancha, 04-50041 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-50041 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 16, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 16, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50041 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAYMOND MONTOYA MANCHA, SR., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-03-CR-102-1 Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Raymond Montoya Mancha, Sr., appeals
More
                                                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                      Fifth Circuit
                                                                   F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                     February 16, 2005

                                                               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                       Clerk
                               No. 04-50041
                             Summary Calendar



                       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

                     RAYMOND MONTOYA MANCHA, SR.,

                                                     Defendant-Appellant.



            Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Western District of Texas
                       USDC No. MO-03-CR-102-1


Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

           Raymond Montoya Mancha, Sr., appeals his conviction for

aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine within one thousand

feet of a school and conspiracy to distribute cocaine within one

thousand feet of a school.       He contends only that evidence of his

two prior cocaine-related convictions should not have been admitted

because they were unduly prejudicial.         The district court did not

abuse its discretion by concluding that the prejudicial value of

the evidence was not substantially outweighed by the danger of


     *
            Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
unfair prejudice.   See United States v. Beechum, 
582 F.2d 898
, 911

(5th Cir. 1978) (en banc).   The judgment of the district court is

          AFFIRMED.




                                 2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer