Filed: Mar. 11, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 11, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 04-30277 _ ALVIN HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus RICHARD L. STALDER; J. GOODWIN; M. RHODES; MORMAN, Sergeant; WARD, Sergeant; FERGUSON, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 03-CV-1833 _ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CU
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 11, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 04-30277 _ ALVIN HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus RICHARD L. STALDER; J. GOODWIN; M. RHODES; MORMAN, Sergeant; WARD, Sergeant; FERGUSON, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 03-CV-1833 _ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CUR..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
March 11, 2005
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
_____________________ Clerk
No. 04-30277
_____________________
ALVIN HARVEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RICHARD L. STALDER; J. GOODWIN;
M. RHODES; MORMAN, Sergeant; WARD,
Sergeant; FERGUSON, Sergeant,
Defendants-Appellees.
__________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 03-CV-1833
__________________________________________________
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The judgment of the district court is affirmed because the
precedent of this circuit requires more than verbal abuse to
raise a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. Gomez v.
Chandler,
163 F.3d 921 (5th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.