Vasquez v. Federal Express Corp, 04-40663 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 04-40663
Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 11, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In the April 11, 2005 United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III for the Fifth Circuit Clerk _ m 04-40663 _ JUAN VASQUEZ; RAYMOND MARTINEZ; JEFFREY DEMICH; JAMES RODRIGUE; ELIZABETH LAUER; DON PRICE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas m 3:02-CV-400-RAS-DDB _ Before SMITH, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In the April 11, 2005 United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III for the Fifth Circuit Clerk _ m 04-40663 _ JUAN VASQUEZ; RAYMOND MARTINEZ; JEFFREY DEMICH; JAMES RODRIGUE; ELIZABETH LAUER; DON PRICE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas m 3:02-CV-400-RAS-DDB _ Before SMITH, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges...
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In the April 11, 2005 United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III for the Fifth Circuit Clerk _______________ m 04-40663 _______________ JUAN VASQUEZ; RAYMOND MARTINEZ; JEFFREY DEMICH; JAMES RODRIGUE; ELIZABETH LAUER; DON PRICE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas m 3:02-CV-400-RAS-DDB ______________________________ Before SMITH, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Current and former employees of Federal Express Corporation appeal a summary judg- ment in this action asserting various violations of the employment laws. We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. As a matter of law, there are no violations under any of the theories asserted. Nor is there a showing of any improperly-motivated deci- sions. The summary judgment is AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be pub- lished and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2
Source: CourtListener
