Filed: May 18, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 18, 2005 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-30921 Clerk _ In Re: LOUIS J. PROVENZA; NORTHSHORE NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY ASSOCIATION, Debtors. LOUIS J. PROVENZA, Appellant, versus LOUANNE FRIEND, Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana No. 2:03-CV-2908-F Before JOLLY, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has carefully co
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 18, 2005 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-30921 Clerk _ In Re: LOUIS J. PROVENZA; NORTHSHORE NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY ASSOCIATION, Debtors. LOUIS J. PROVENZA, Appellant, versus LOUANNE FRIEND, Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana No. 2:03-CV-2908-F Before JOLLY, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has carefully con..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 18, 2005 _______________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-30921 Clerk _______________________ In Re: LOUIS J. PROVENZA; NORTHSHORE NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY ASSOCIATION, Debtors. LOUIS J. PROVENZA, Appellant, versus LOUANNE FRIEND, Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana No. 2:03-CV-2908-F Before JOLLY, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has carefully considered this case in light of the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or law. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by the bankruptcy court, as affirmed by the district court. See 5th Circuit Loc. Rule 47.6. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
