Filed: Apr. 20, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50743 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAUL MORAN-CORTEZ, also known as Salvador Ramirez- Cortez, also known as Saul Ramirez-Cortez, also known as Saul Kiros Aranzamendy, also known as Juan Mendina, also known as Juan Medina Cortez, also known as Cesar Quiros, also known as Arturo Peniche, De
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50743 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAUL MORAN-CORTEZ, also known as Salvador Ramirez- Cortez, also known as Saul Ramirez-Cortez, also known as Saul Kiros Aranzamendy, also known as Juan Mendina, also known as Juan Medina Cortez, also known as Cesar Quiros, also known as Arturo Peniche, Def..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-50743
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SAUL MORAN-CORTEZ, also known as Salvador Ramirez-
Cortez, also known as Saul Ramirez-Cortez, also
known as Saul Kiros Aranzamendy, also known as Juan
Mendina, also known as Juan Medina Cortez, also known
as Cesar Quiros, also known as Arturo Peniche,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-61-1-LY
--------------------
Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Saul Moran-Cortez
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.
United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior
conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and
not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.