Filed: Apr. 20, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50747 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FELIPE VASQUEZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-77-1-SS - Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal C
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50747 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FELIPE VASQUEZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-77-1-SS - Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Ca..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-50747
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FELIPE VASQUEZ-SANCHEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-77-1-SS
--------------------
Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Felipe Vasquez-
Sanchez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres
v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior
conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and
not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for
summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.