Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Gomez-Morales, 03-41665 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-41665 Visitors: 29
Filed: May 27, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 27, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41665 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LEONARDO GOMEZ-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (03-CR-484) - ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   May 27, 2005

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                             No. 03-41665
                           Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONARDO GOMEZ-MORALES,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Texas
                              (03-CR-484)
                         --------------------

         ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Supreme Court has vacated the former judgment and

remanded for further consideration in light of United States v.

Booker, 
125 S. Ct. 738
(2005).     Because the sentence was correctly

imposed under the opinions of the Supreme Court cited in our

opinion, and because we find no Booker error, the judgment of the

district court is again

     AFFIRMED.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer