United States v. Drew, 04-10972 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 04-10972
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 24, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals _ Fifth Circuit No. 04-10972 _ F I L E D May 24, 2005 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. CHRIS RICHARD DREW Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (04-CR-48) - Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is gr
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals _ Fifth Circuit No. 04-10972 _ F I L E D May 24, 2005 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. CHRIS RICHARD DREW Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (04-CR-48) - Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is gra..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals _____________________ Fifth Circuit No. 04-10972 _____________________ F I L E D May 24, 2005 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. CHRIS RICHARD DREW Defendant - Appellant --------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (04-CR-48) --------------------- Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to remand case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division for resentencing is granted. ___________________ * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
