Filed: Jun. 16, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 16, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30816 NABORS OFFSHORE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and Certain Insurance Companies Subscribing to Policy Numbers JHB-CJP-1278B and JHB2M000109, Intervenor - Plaintiff, versus TRI-UNION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Third-Party - Plaintiff, versus OTECO, INCORPORATED, Third-Party - Defendant, *********
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 16, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30816 NABORS OFFSHORE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and Certain Insurance Companies Subscribing to Policy Numbers JHB-CJP-1278B and JHB2M000109, Intervenor - Plaintiff, versus TRI-UNION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Third-Party - Plaintiff, versus OTECO, INCORPORATED, Third-Party - Defendant, **********..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 16, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30816 NABORS OFFSHORE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and Certain Insurance Companies Subscribing to Policy Numbers JHB-CJP-1278B and JHB2M000109, Intervenor - Plaintiff, versus TRI-UNION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Third-Party - Plaintiff, versus OTECO, INCORPORATED, Third-Party - Defendant, ********************************************************* ARNOLD BENOIT; ET AL, Plaintiffs, ARNOLD BENOIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OTECO, INC. Intervenor Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana (2:02-CV-2976) Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:* We are persuaded that the verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence and AFFIRM the district court. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2
