Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Carranza-Villegas, 02-21166 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-21166 Visitors: 39
Filed: Jun. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-21166 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCIAL CARRANZA-VILLEGAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-87-ALL - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed for Marcial Ca
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   June 22, 2005

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 02-21166
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARCIAL CARRANZA-VILLEGAS,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:02-CR-87-ALL
                       --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed for Marcial Carranza-Villegas (“Carranza”)

has filed a motion for leave to withdraw and a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).      Carranza has

submitted two responses to counsel’s brief, moving in one to

proceed pro se on appeal and, in the other, for the appointment

of new counsel.   Carranza’s motions are DENIED.

     Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Carranza’s

responses, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 02-21166
                                 -2-

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer