Filed: Jun. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41571 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN PATLAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-474-ALL - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Jonathan Patl
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41571 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN PATLAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-474-ALL - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Jonathan Patla..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-41571
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JONATHAN PATLAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:03-CR-474-ALL
--------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Jonathan Patlan has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Patlan has not filed a response
to the motion. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.