Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Patlan, 03-41571 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-41571 Visitors: 36
Filed: Jun. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41571 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN PATLAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-474-ALL - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Jonathan Patl
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                                 F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    June 22, 2005

                                                              Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                      Clerk
                              No. 03-41571
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                        Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JONATHAN PATLAN,

                                        Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 5:03-CR-474-ALL
                         --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Jonathan Patlan has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).       Patlan has not filed a response

to the motion.     Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer