Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Clack, 04-41170 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-41170 Visitors: 256
Filed: Jun. 22, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41170 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL SHANE CLACK, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-181-1 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Michael Sha
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 22, 2005

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 04-41170
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL SHANE CLACK,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 2:04-CR-181-1

                       --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Michael Shane Clack moves this

court for leave to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738
(1967), and has filed a brief in support of his

motion.   Clack has not filed a response.

     Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.   Accordingly, the

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 04-41170
                               -2-

further responsibilities herein.   The appeal is DISMISSED.   See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer