Filed: Jun. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41173 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO OSTOS-DEL ANGEL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-119-ALL - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antonio Ostos-Del Angel (Ostos) a
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41173 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO OSTOS-DEL ANGEL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-119-ALL - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antonio Ostos-Del Angel (Ostos) ap..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-41173
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO OSTOS-DEL ANGEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:04-CR-119-ALL
--------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Antonio Ostos-Del Angel (Ostos) appeals his guilty-plea
conviction and sentence for importation into the United States
from Mexico of approximately 31 kilograms of cocaine, in
violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960(a)(1) & (b)(1)(B) and
18 U.S.C. § 2. Ostos argues for the first time on appeal that
21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960(a) & (b) are unconstitutional in light
of the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530
U.S. 466 (2000). As Ostos concedes, this argument is foreclosed
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-41173
-2-
by our decision in United States v. Slaughter,
238 F.3d 580 (5th
Cir. 2000).
AFFIRMED.