United States v. Zacarias-Amador, 04-51459 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 04-51459
Visitors: 53
Filed: Jul. 05, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 5, 2005 _ No. 04-51459 Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. JUAN CARLOS ZACARIAS-AMADOR Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (04-CR-668) - Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentenc
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 5, 2005 _ No. 04-51459 Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. JUAN CARLOS ZACARIAS-AMADOR Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (04-CR-668) - Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 5, 2005 _____________________ No. 04-51459 Charles R. Fulbruge III _____________________ Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. JUAN CARLOS ZACARIAS-AMADOR Defendant - Appellant --------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (04-CR-668) --------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to remand case for resentencing in light of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Booker and this Court’s opinion in Mares is granted. _______________ *Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion in the alternative to extend time to file appellee’s brief until 14 days from the Court’s denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is moot.
Source: CourtListener
