United States v. Nunez-De La Cruz, 05-50009 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 05-50009
Visitors: 37
Filed: Jun. 24, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 24, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 05-50009 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. ARTURO NUNEZ-DE LA CRUZ Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, El Paso - Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 24, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 05-50009 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. ARTURO NUNEZ-DE LA CRUZ Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, El Paso - Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is G..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 24, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _____________________ Clerk No. 05-50009 _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. ARTURO NUNEZ-DE LA CRUZ Defendant - Appellant --------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, El Paso --------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to remand the case to the Western District of Texas, El Paso Division for resentencing is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative request for an extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 14 days from the denial of Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is 1 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. MOOT.
Source: CourtListener
