Filed: Jul. 25, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 25, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-11418 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. JOSE MARTIN RUIZ Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-31-5-C - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent J
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 25, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-11418 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. JOSE MARTIN RUIZ Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-31-5-C - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Jo..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 25, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-11418
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
JOSE MARTIN RUIZ
Defendant - Appellant
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:04-CR-31-5-C
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and PRADO, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Jose Martin Ruiz has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although Ruiz was
informed of his right to respond, he has declined to do so. Our
independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.