Filed: Aug. 08, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 8, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30291 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. JOSEPH P LYMORE Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 03-CR-69-ALL-L - Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 8, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30291 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. JOSEPH P LYMORE Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 03-CR-69-ALL-L - Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 8, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-30291
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
JOSEPH P LYMORE
Defendant - Appellant
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 03-CR-69-ALL-L
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Joseph P. Lymore has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the briefs, record, and Mr. Lymore’s response discloses
no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R.
42.2. Lymore’s motion to proceed pro se is denied. See United
States v. Wagner,
158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-30291
-2-
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; MOTION TO PROCEED PRO SE DENIED;
APPEAL DISMISSED.