Filed: Aug. 10, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 10, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40787 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FELIX LEAL GARZA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-378-1 - Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed for Felix Leal Garza (“
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 10, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40787 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FELIX LEAL GARZA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-378-1 - Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed for Felix Leal Garza (“G..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 10, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-40787
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FELIX LEAL GARZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:03-CR-378-1
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed for Felix Leal Garza (“Garza”) has filed a
motion for leave to withdraw, a brief, and a supplemental letter
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Garza has filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s
briefs, Garza’s response, and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED; counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.