Filed: Aug. 18, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50276 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OSCAR LUIS GARCIA, also known as Alvaro Duran-Lopez, also known as Jesus Renteria, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1782-ALL - Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Ci
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50276 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OSCAR LUIS GARCIA, also known as Alvaro Duran-Lopez, also known as Jesus Renteria, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1782-ALL - Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Cir..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 17, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-50276
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OSCAR LUIS GARCIA, also known as Alvaro
Duran-Lopez, also known as Jesus Renteria,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:04-CR-1782-ALL
--------------------
Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar Luis Garcia
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.
United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior
conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and
not a separate criminal offense, and by United States v. Mares,
402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar.
31, 2005) (No. 04-9517), and its progeny, which held that
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-50276
-2-
unpreserved claims based on United States v. Booker,
125 S. Ct.
738 (2005), are reviewed for plain error. The Government’s
motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.