Filed: Oct. 25, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 24, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40942 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, versus WELLINGTON ROELI GONZALEZ-CISNEROS, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-148-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Wellington Roeli Go
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 24, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40942 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, versus WELLINGTON ROELI GONZALEZ-CISNEROS, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-148-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Wellington Roeli Gon..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
October 24, 2005
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-40942
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-
Appellee,
versus
WELLINGTON ROELI GONZALEZ-CISNEROS,
Defendant-
Appellant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-148-ALL
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Wellington Roeli Gonzalez-Cisneros appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea
to illegal reentry. He argues for the first time on appeal that he is entitled to resentencing because
he was sentenced under the mandatory Guideline regime held unconstitutional in United States v.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Booker,
125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). We review this argument for plain error only. United States v.
Martinez-Lugo,
411 F.3d 597, 600-01 (5th Cir. 2005).
Our review of the record does not reveal that the district court’s error affected the outcome
of the sentencing proceedings. See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,
407 F.3d 728, 732-33 (5th
Cir. 2005). Gonzalez has therefore failed to establish that the error affected his substantial rights, and
he consequently cannot meet the plain error standard of review.
Id. Given that Gonzalez is not
entitled to resentencing, we pretermit discussion of the validity of his appeal waiver.
AFFIRMED.
-2-