Filed: Nov. 09, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50253 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID RIVAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-693-ALL-AML - Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50253 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID RIVAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-693-ALL-AML - Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal C..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 9, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-50253
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID RIVAS, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:03-CR-693-ALL-AML
--------------------
Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, David Rivas, Jr.,
raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.
Slaughter,
238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that
Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not render
21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face. The Government’s
motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.