Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. McKinney, 03-41530 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-41530 Visitors: 51
Filed: Dec. 14, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41530 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCUS DEWAYNE MCKINNEY, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-83-1 - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appo
More
                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                   Fifth Circuit
                                                                  F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    December 14, 2005

                                                               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                       Clerk
                             No. 03-41530
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARCUS DEWAYNE MCKINNEY,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Eastern District of Texas
                        USDC No. 1:03-CR-83-1
                         --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Marcus Dewayne McKinney

has filed a motion to withdraw and briefs pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 744 (1967).       McKinney has not filed a

response.   Our independent review of the briefs and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer