Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hollis, 03-50057 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-50057 Visitors: 60
Filed: Dec. 01, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED REVISED DECEMBER 1, 2005 November 30, 2005 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Charles R. Fulbruge III FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Clerk _ No. 03-50057 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. HORACE EDWARD HOLLIS, JR Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco W-02-CR-62-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s
More
                                                                                   United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                                         FILED
                              REVISED DECEMBER 1, 2005                             November 30, 2005
                     IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                                 Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                                   Clerk
                                 _____________________
                                      No. 03-50057
                                 _____________________


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                        Plaintiff - Appellee
                         v.
HORACE EDWARD HOLLIS, JR
                        Defendant - Appellant



                           ---------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                      Western District of Texas, Waco
                               W-02-CR-62-ALL
                           ---------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*


       IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the

sentence is GRANTED.

       IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand case for resentencing consistent with Mitchell v. United

States, 
482 F.2d 289
(5th Cir. 1973) is GRANTED.

       IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to



       *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
extend the time to file supplemental material requested by court

fourteen (14) days from disposition of motion to vacate is DENIED
AS MOOT.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer