Filed: Dec. 14, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 03-51218 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARIEL RODRIGUEZ-ARMENDARIZ, also known as Mario Rodriguez, also known as Joseph Armando Ramirez, also known as Iran Martinez-Collaso, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-03-
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 03-51218 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARIEL RODRIGUEZ-ARMENDARIZ, also known as Mario Rodriguez, also known as Joseph Armando Ramirez, also known as Iran Martinez-Collaso, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-03-C..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 03-51218 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARIEL RODRIGUEZ-ARMENDARIZ, also known as Mario Rodriguez,
also known as Joseph Armando Ramirez, also known as Iran
Martinez-Collaso,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. MO-03-CR-66-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Ariel Rodriguez-Armendariz
has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the brief, Rodriguez’s response, and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.