Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Rodriguez-Armendariz, 03-51218 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-51218 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 14, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 03-51218 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARIEL RODRIGUEZ-ARMENDARIZ, also known as Mario Rodriguez, also known as Joseph Armando Ramirez, also known as Iran Martinez-Collaso, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-03-
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 14, 2005

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                            No. 03-51218                          Clerk
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARIEL RODRIGUEZ-ARMENDARIZ, also known as Mario Rodriguez,
also known as Joseph Armando Ramirez, also known as Iran
Martinez-Collaso,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. MO-03-CR-66-ALL
                       --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Ariel Rodriguez-Armendariz

has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Our independent review of the brief, Rodriguez’s response, and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer