Filed: Dec. 14, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41229 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SALOMON GUILLEN OLIVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-476-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41229 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SALOMON GUILLEN OLIVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-476-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-41229
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SALOMON GUILLEN OLIVAREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:00-CR-476-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Salomon Guillen Olivarez
has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Olivarez received
a copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.