Filed: Dec. 14, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41615 Conference Calendar MICHAEL DOYLE GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus RONNY BROWNLOW, Sheriff, Henderson County Jail; A. W. ALLISON, Assistant Chief, Henderson County Jail; SANDY PRYOR, Nurse, Henderson County Jail, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41615 Conference Calendar MICHAEL DOYLE GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus RONNY BROWNLOW, Sheriff, Henderson County Jail; A. W. ALLISON, Assistant Chief, Henderson County Jail; SANDY PRYOR, Nurse, Henderson County Jail, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No...
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-41615
Conference Calendar
MICHAEL DOYLE GRAY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RONNY BROWNLOW, Sheriff, Henderson County Jail;
A. W. ALLISON, Assistant Chief, Henderson County Jail;
SANDY PRYOR, Nurse, Henderson County Jail,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:04-CV-301
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Henderson County, Texas, jail inmate Michael Doyle Gray
appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) as frivolous and for failure to state a
claim. Gray’s complaint alleged that he received inadequate
medical treatment for a back injury. Gray’s pleadings make it
clear that his injury has been adequately treated and that he
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-41615
-2-
merely disagrees with some aspects of his medical treatment.
Varnado v. Lynaugh,
920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991).
We note that Gray has not supported his appellate arguments
with citation to the record and to legal authority as required by
the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. See FED. R. APP. P.
28(a)(7) and (9)(A) (2004); 5TH CIR. R. 28.2.3; Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d 222, 224 (5th Cir. 1993).
As this appeal is without arguable merit, it is dismissed as
frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215,
219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Gray is cautioned that the dismissal of
this appeal as frivolous and the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) count as two
strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). If Gray accumulates
three strikes, he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis
in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or
detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of
serious physical injury. See Adepegba v. Hammons,
103 F.3d 383,
388 (5th Cir. 1996); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.