Filed: Dec. 14, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10039 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROGELIO PEREZ-TRUJILLO, also known as Roberto Gutierrez, also known as Rogelio Cerda-Trevino, also known as Eduardo Hernandez Lozano, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10039 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROGELIO PEREZ-TRUJILLO, also known as Roberto Gutierrez, also known as Rogelio Cerda-Trevino, also known as Eduardo Hernandez Lozano, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-C..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-10039
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROGELIO PEREZ-TRUJILLO, also known as Roberto
Gutierrez, also known as Rogelio Cerda-Trevino,
also known as Eduardo Hernandez Lozano,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:03-CR-277-ALL-L
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rogelio Perez-
Trujillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.
Mares,
402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
126 S. Ct. 43
(2005), and its progeny, which held that unpreserved claims based
on United States v. Booker,
125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), are reviewed
for plain error and by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523
U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-10039
-2-
sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate
criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance
is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.