Filed: Feb. 10, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 10, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50603 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERTO TOMAS YOUNGBLOOD, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:02-CR-86-ALL - Before GARWOOD, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alberto Youngblood appeals from the d
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 10, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50603 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERTO TOMAS YOUNGBLOOD, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:02-CR-86-ALL - Before GARWOOD, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alberto Youngblood appeals from the di..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 10, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-50603
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALBERTO TOMAS YOUNGBLOOD,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:02-CR-86-ALL
--------------------
Before GARWOOD, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alberto Youngblood appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion to dismiss the Government’s request for
discovery and directing Youngblood to answer the Government’s
discovery.
This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its
own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby,
813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th
Cir. 1997). Orders directing or denying discovery are not final
decisions within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and are not
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-50603
-2-
appealable except under limited circumstances not presented in
this case. See Branch v. Phillips Petroleum Co.,
638 F.2d 873,
877-78 (5th Cir. 1981).
APPEAL DISMISSED.