United States v. Linan, 05-40634 (2006)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 05-40634
Visitors: 73
Filed: Feb. 06, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 6, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40634 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVIER LINAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 3:02-MJ-35-ALL - Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Javier Linan appeals the sentence of imprisonment impose
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 6, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40634 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVIER LINAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 3:02-MJ-35-ALL - Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Javier Linan appeals the sentence of imprisonment imposed..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 6, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-40634
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAVIER LINAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
No. 3:02-MJ-35-ALL
--------------------
Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Javier Linan appeals the sentence of imprisonment imposed by
the magistrate judge upon revocation of his probation. See
18 U.S.C. § 3401; 28 U.S.C. § 636(a)(4). This court lacks juris-
diction over the instant appeal. 18 U.S.C. § 3742(h). The appeal
is therefore DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circum-
stances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener