Filed: Feb. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-10801 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRYAN JERMINE WEBSTER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CR-310-4-T - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender represen
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-10801 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRYAN JERMINE WEBSTER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CR-310-4-T - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender represent..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
F I L E D
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 04-10801 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRYAN JERMINE WEBSTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:99-CR-310-4-T
--------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender representing Bryan Jermine
Webster has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Webster
was informed of counsel’s motion but has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.