Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Mejia-Ruiz, 04-10904 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-10904 Visitors: 54
Filed: Feb. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-10904 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. WALTER ALBERTO MEJIA-RUIZ Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-34-ALL-A - Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Walter Alberto Mejia-Ruiz (Mejia) appea
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 21, 2006

                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk
                             No. 04-10904
                           Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                     Plaintiff - Appellee

     v.

WALTER ALBERTO MEJIA-RUIZ

                     Defendant - Appellant

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:04-CR-34-ALL-A
                        --------------------

Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Walter Alberto Mejia-Ruiz (Mejia) appeals his sentence

following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry.       He

argues that the district court reversibly erred under United

States v. Booker, 
543 U.S. 220
(2005), by sentencing him pursuant

to a mandatory application of the Sentencing Guidelines.       The

Government concedes that Mejia has preserved this issue for

appeal.   The Government, however, has not shown beyond a

reasonable doubt that the error was harmless.     See United States


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 04-10904
                               -2-

v. Walters, 
418 F.3d 461
, 463-64 (5th Cir. 2005).   Accordingly,

Mejia’s sentence is vacated, and this case is remanded for

resentencing.

     CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR

RESENTENCING.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer