Filed: Oct. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-30996 Document: 00513726977 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/20/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 15-30996 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar October 20, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, versus KEITH PARKER, Defendant–Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:05-CR-89-1 Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM
Summary: Case: 15-30996 Document: 00513726977 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/20/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 15-30996 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar October 20, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, versus KEITH PARKER, Defendant–Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:05-CR-89-1 Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:..
More
Case: 15-30996 Document: 00513726977 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/20/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
No. 15-30996
Fifth Circuit
FILED
Summary Calendar October 20, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff–Appellee,
versus
KEITH PARKER,
Defendant–Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:05-CR-89-1
Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Keith Parker, federal prisoner # 04330-095, who was convicted of, inter
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 15-30996 Document: 00513726977 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/20/2016
No. 15-30996
alia, possession with intent to distribute marihuana and cocaine base, appeals
the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).
The government moves for summary affirmance and, alternatively, for an
extension of time to file its brief.
Because Parker does not meaningfully challenge the denial of the
§ 3582(c)(2) motion, he has abandoned the critical issue in the appeal. See
Brinkmann v. Dall. Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner,
813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.
1987). The government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and
the judgment is AFFIRMED. The government’s alternative motion for an
extension of time to file its brief is DENIED as unnecessary.
2