Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Fernando Barraza-Reveles, 16-50242 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 16-50242 Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-50242 Document: 00513758729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-50242 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar November 14, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. FERNANDO BARRAZA-REVELES, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:13-CR-1106-1 Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER C
More
     Case: 16-50242      Document: 00513758729         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/14/2016




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                             United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 16-50242
                                                                                      Fifth Circuit

                                                                                    FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                          November 14, 2016
                                                                               Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                           Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FERNANDO BARRAZA-REVELES,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 2:13-CR-1106-1


Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando Barraza-
Reveles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Barraza-Reveles has not filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-50242    Document: 00513758729     Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/14/2016


                                 No. 16-50242

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer