Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Clark, 05-10066 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-10066 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 24, 2006 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10066 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BILLY RAY CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-423-ALL-R - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to rep
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                             FILED
                                                     February 24, 2006
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                   Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                           Clerk

                             No. 05-10066
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BILLY RAY CLARK,
                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                   USDC No. 3:03-CR-423-ALL-R
                      --------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Billy Ray

Clark has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).             Clark has

not filed a response.    Our independent review of the brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer