Filed: Feb. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40094 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICARDO AGUILAR-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:99-CR-568-1 - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, appoi
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40094 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICARDO AGUILAR-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:99-CR-568-1 - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, appoin..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-40094
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICARDO AGUILAR-HERNANDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:99-CR-568-1
--------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Ricardo
Aguilar-Hernandez (Aguilar), has moved to withdraw and has filed
a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Aguilar has filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw in
which he requests the appointment of replacement counsel. Our
independent review of the brief, Aguilar’s response, and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities, Aguilar’s motion for appointment of
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-40094
-2-
replacement counsel is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.