Filed: Dec. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-50243 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 20, 2016 SEALED APPELLEE, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. SEALED APPELLANT, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-317-4 Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Appellant has moved for le
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-50243 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 20, 2016 SEALED APPELLEE, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. SEALED APPELLANT, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-317-4 Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Appellant has moved for lea..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-50243
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 20, 2016
SEALED APPELLEE,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SEALED APPELLANT,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:06-CR-317-4
Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Appellant has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Appellant has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 16-50243
appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2