Filed: Feb. 23, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40596 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO SALAS-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-901-ALL - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antonio Salas-Jimenez (Salas) pleade
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40596 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO SALAS-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-901-ALL - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antonio Salas-Jimenez (Salas) pleaded..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 23, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-40596
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO SALAS-JIMENEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-901-ALL
--------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Antonio Salas-Jimenez (Salas) pleaded guilty to being found
in the United States after deportation and was sentenced to 30
months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release. He
contends for the first time on appeal that the district court
erred by ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA
sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for
review. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,
428 F.3d 1100, 1101-
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-40596
-2-
02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No.
05-8662).
Salas contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional
and that this court should vacate his sentence and remand his
case for resentencing to no more than two years in prison under 8
U.S.C. § 1326(a). As he concedes, this contention is foreclosed
by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998).
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.