Filed: Feb. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40687 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RITO A. SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-206-ALL - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, appointed to
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40687 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RITO A. SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-206-ALL - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, appointed to r..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-40687
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RITO A. SANCHEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:05-CR-206-ALL
--------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Rito A.
Sanchez, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sanchez
has not filed a response to the motion. Our independent review
of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for
appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.