Filed: May 08, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: REVISED May 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 15-50864 FILED Summary Calendar May 5, 2017 _ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. CAMERAN ARNOLD FLANAGAN, Defendant–Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:11-CR-29-1 _ Before JONES, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s motion to
Summary: REVISED May 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 15-50864 FILED Summary Calendar May 5, 2017 _ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. CAMERAN ARNOLD FLANAGAN, Defendant–Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:11-CR-29-1 _ Before JONES, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s motion to r..
More
REVISED May 8, 2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 15-50864 FILED
Summary Calendar May 5, 2017
__________
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff–Appellee,
v.
CAMERAN ARNOLD FLANAGAN,
Defendant–Appellant.
_______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:11-CR-29-1
_______________________
Before JONES, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s motion to reform the judgment dated
August 20, 2015, by adding that the reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582 also applies to reducing count 2 to 110 months, is GRANTED.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 15-50864
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s motion to affirm the judg-
ment as modified is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s alternative motion for an
extension to file its brief is DENIED as unnecessary.
2